Determination of Village Development Priorities Based on Decision Support System Using the FAHP-WP Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56873/jitu.7.2.5887Keywords:
Analytic Hierarchy Process Fuzzy, Decision-making; , Village development; , Prioritization; , Weighted ProductAbstract
Villages play a strategic role in national development, particularly in improving the quality of life and community welfare. Rengel Village, located in Tuban Regency, East Java, holds significant potential for development. However, decision-making in development through the “Musrenbangdes” (village development planning forum) is often hindered by conflicts of interest between neighborhood units (RT and RW) and the lack of an objective system to assess priorities. Therefore, a Decision Support System (DSS) utilizing the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) and Weighted Product (WP) methods is needed to prioritize development. F-AHP determines criterion weights based on relative importance and addresses uncertainty in assessments, while WP ranks alternatives based on these weights. This study involves data collection, calculation of criterion weights, alternative development ranking, system development, and deriving conclusions. The results show that the CR value of 0.033 indicates a good level of consistency in comparisons, yielding the following criterion weights: RPJM (0.331), Urgency Level (0.278), Impact and Benefits (0.237), Regulatory Compliance (0.14), and Budget (0.014). Meanwhile, the alternative development ranking results indicate the following priority order: AP41 (1), AP06 (2), AP33 (3), AP49 (4), AP12 (5), AP40 (6), AP13 (7), AP11 (8), AP43 (9), and AP28 (10).
References
[1] A. Ariadi. (2019). Perencanaan Pembangunan Desa. Meraja Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 135–147. Available; https://merajajournal.com/index.php/mrj/article/view/54
[2] A. Podvesovskii, A. Zakharova, D. Korostelyov, and A. Kuzin. 2021. DecisionMaster: A multi-criteria decision support system with ability to combine different decision rules. SoftwareX, vol. 16, p. 100814, 2021. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352711021001114
[3] DPMPTK, “Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah,” Oct. 3, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://dpmpt.kulonprogokab.go.id/detil/391/perencanaan-pembangunan-daerah. [Accessed: Sep. 26, 2024].
[4] M. Peron, L. Agnusdei, P. P. Miglietta, G. P. Agnusdei, S. Finco, and A. Del Prete. (2024). Additive vs conventional manufacturing for producing complex systems: A decision support system and the impact of electricity prices and raw materials availability. Computers & Industrial Engineering. [Online]. 194, p. 110406. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224005278
[5] Y. Matsuo, S. Endo, Y. Nagatomi, Y. Shibata, R. Komiyama, and Y. Fujii. (2020). Investigating the economics of the power sector under high penetration of variable renewable energies. Applied Energy. [Online]. 267, p. 113956. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261919316435
[6] Y. Liu, C. M. Eckert, and C. Earl. (2020). A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgments. Expert Systems with Applications. [Online]. 161, p. 113738. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0957417420305625
[7] Purnia, D.S., Adiwisastra, M.F., Alawiyah, T., Nurmala, L., & Hikmah, A.B. (2020). Penentuan Prioritas Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Menggunakan Metode Promethee (Studi Kasus BAPPEDA Ciamis). IJCIT (Indonesian J. Comput. Inf. Technol.), 5(2), pp.187–197.
[8] Jasril, J., Haerani, E., & Afrianty, I. (2011). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (SPK) Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy AHP (F-AHP). In Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi (SNATI).
[9] Iswara, R. A., Santoso, E., & Rahayudi, B. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Penentuan Mustahik (Penerima Zakat) Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy AHP (F-AHP). Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 2(3), 1306-1312.
[10] Lubis, A.I., Erdiansyah, U., & Setiawan, F. (2021). Kombinasi Metode AHP dan Weighted Product Dalam Penentuan Evaluasi Kinerja Asisten Pengajar. Digital Transformation Technology, 1(2), pp.38-44.
[11] M. M. Niazmandi, R. Sedaeesoula, S. Lari, and M. Yousefi. (2024). Integrated project delivery (IPD) capabilities on reducing claims in urban underground projects: A hybrid FAHP-FTOPSIS approach. Sustainable Futures. [Online]. 7, p. 100175. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266618882400025X
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Information Technology and Its Utilization
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The proposed policy for journals that offer open access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
